I started talking about this roll out of 5 G back in April and the connection of radiation poisoning mimicking the same symptoms that a lot of people were seeing in CV.
One of the first doctors I shared was Dr. Sharon Goldberg- you can see her testimony given HERE
Now before you roll your eyes- no one THINKS 5g itself causes the virus. If you haven't dug in to see that viruses are NOT ALIVE, now is the time to get started. Check out the book "The Invisible Rainbow" and also "What Really Makes Us Ill" in my RECOMMENDED BOOKS section of my website.
Our cells can be weak, latent viruses can be in our bodies and be ACTIVATED by electromagnetic frequencies- see study linked HERE
Which opens up a whole other set of questions- where did these latent viruses come from? How did they get there? Well I'll let you determine that but it has so much to do with the regulations in our "health care" system (aka va((ines), water, our soil is polluted, our food is altered with GMOs, we are impacted with EMFs on a daily basis that our bodies cannot handle.
Electric fields are produced whether or not a device is turned on, whereas magnetic fields are produced only when current is flowing, which usually requires a device to be turned on. Power lines produce magnetic fields continuously because current is always flowing through them. Electric fields are easily shielded or weakened by walls and other objects, whereas magnetic fields can pass through buildings, living things, and most other materials.
We are being made sick and our bodies are disrupted on purpose. I think the mindset we need to get past is the thinking "If it wasn't safe it wouldn't be available"
Let's not get started on how many things the government used to tell us that were safe, and many of which are still allowed on the market today that cause irreversible harm to our bodies
4)Aluminium in va((ines.... (watch the Vaxxed Documentary about the CDC whistleblower who connects autism and more to this)
Any given exposure to these are proven to be disruptive to humans-
Radio Frequency Radiation
To put this into a visual, current 4g which many of us are operating on functions at a max of 3.8ghz
5g, at its highest (publicly disclosed) will be functioning at 28 ghz
5G signals are not capable of traveling large distances (over a few hundred meters), unlike 4G or lower frequency5G signals. This requires placing 5G base stations every few hundred meters in order to use higher frequency bands. Hence all of the new installations of towers you're seeing everywhere, the thousands of satellites going up from SpaceX, and the roll out of all these new 5g enabled mobile devices.
What is the extent of our exposure on the daily?
(I'm only going to cover a couple below with articles/studies backing such because this is basically a never ending topic unfortunately! )
1) Home Appliances
Microwaves are a radiation source that is placed right in our own homes, slowly causing cell disruption.
Remember that label on my new microwave that got installed this past year?
"WARNING- CANCER AND REPRODUCTIVE HARM"
I don't ever remember seeing these type of labels. Wonder why that's happening now? A nice "disclaimer" to protect them from future lawsuits perhaps?
Our cell phones in our hand are causing cellular disruption as well.
Apple has issued a safety warning in every iPhone user manual – but, they deceptively printed it in tiny print and located it in a section where no one will see it. Yep, it’s in yours! Go take a look in the section on radio frequency compliance – in the section that talks about SAR (what’s SAR?) and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) required warning to never use or carry the iPhone on your body. You’ll need a magnifying glass, however as the print is so small, it is barely legible with the naked eye. Here’s a quote of what you’ll find in the user guide that came with your iPhone.
“SAR measurement may exceed the FCC exposure guidelines for body-worn operation if positioned less than 15 mm (5/8 inch) from the body (e.g. when carrying iPhone in your pocket). For optimal mobile device performance and to be sure that human exposure to RF energy does not exceed the FCC, IC, and European Union guidelines, always follow these instructions and precautions: When on a call using the built-in audio receiver in iPhone, hold iPhone with the dock connector pointed down toward your shoulder to increase separation from the antenna. When using iPhone near your body for voice calls or for wireless data transmission over a cellular network, keep iPhone at least 15 mm (5/8 inch) away from the body, and only use carrying cases, belt clips, or holders that do not have metal parts and that maintain at least 15 mm (5/8 inch) separation between iPhone and the body.”
The cell phone industry executives claim that cell phone radiation is not a big deal and there is no unsafe way to use a cell phone. This is what Apple and all the other manufacturers want you to believe. But, the facts tell us otherwise!
Even the NY times published an article with a statement from the good ol' World Health Organization releasing these same findings, you can find it in this link HERE
The finding, from the agency’s International Agency for Research on Cancer, adds to concerns among a small but growing group of experts about the health effects of low levels of radiation emitted by cellphones. The panel, which consisted of 31 scientists from 14 countries, was led by Dr. Jonathan M. Samet, a physician and epidemiologist at the University of Southern California and a member of President Obama’s National Cancer Advisory Board.
But in case it gets pulled down, I'll also create a full post of the screen shots and post it. Things seem to go missing nowadays more and more. Hmm...
3)Exposure to Power Lines
Exposure from power lines. Although a study in 1979 pointed to a possible association between living near electric power lines and childhood leukemia, more recent studies need to be conducted.
Most of these studies found cancers present in those children who lived in homes with very high levels of magnetic fields, which are increasing by the day. Several studies have analyzed the combined data from multiple studies of power line exposure and childhood leukemia:
A pooled analysis of nine studies reported a twofold increase in risk of childhood leukemia among children with exposures of 0.4 μT or higher. Less than 1 percent of the children in the studies experienced this level of exposure (25).
A meta-analysis of 15 studies observed a 1.7-fold increase in childhood leukemia among children with exposures of 0.3 μT or higher. A little more than 3 percent of children in the studies experienced this level of exposure (26).
More recently, a pooled analysis of seven studies published after 2000 reported a 1.4-fold increase in childhood leukemia among children with exposures of 0.3 μT or higher.
What have studies shown about possible associations between non-ionizing EMFs and cancer in children?
Numerous epidemiologic studies and comprehensive reviews of the scientific literature have evaluated possible associations between exposure to non-ionizing EMFs and risk of cancer in children (12–14). (Magnetic fields are the component of non-ionizing EMFs that are usually studied in relation to their possible health effects.) Most of the research has focused on leukemia and brain tumors, the two most common cancers in children. Studies have examined associations of these cancers with living near power lines, with magnetic fields in the home, and with exposure of parents to high levels of magnetic fields in the workplace. No consistent evidence for an association between any source of non-ionizing EMF and cancer has been found.
Anyways, there's so much more to explore on this end, and I could continue to site source after source- but click HERE to go to the link for the full breakdown video that I think everyone should see. It's a cut down to the basics video, with great detailed information.
I don't know the original source, so if you happen to know please send her info my way so I can give her proper credit!
Keep on researching friends! Having an open mind is the key to getting to the bottom of things and truly being your own health advocate.
Additional Source : Cancer and EMFS - click HERE
Edited to add this article that was released today- important section in red
So many ducks and dodges in the media. They are just not doing the studies to avoid exposing the harm that this can do to our bodies and it's pretty sickening. Read between the lines
Available scientific research shows that a link between 5G and disease is not proven and not likely. At the same time, it cannot be scientifically ruled out that there is no connection with cancer, fertility in men, pregnancy outcomes and birth defects. The Health Council therefore recommends careful monitoring of exposure. The council also recommends keeping exposure as low as reasonably possible.